Home
  About the SAHRC
  About the SAHRC
  Background  
  Objectives  
  Structure  
  Commissioners  
  Secretariat  
  Functions  
  Contacts
  Calendar
  Media
  Media Releases 2008  
  Media Releases 2007  
  Publications
  PAIA Guide  
  SAHRC Reports  
  Annual Reports  
  SAHRC Booklets  
  SAHRC Newsletter  
  SAHRC Catalogues  
  SAHRC Manual  
  SAHRC Pamphlets  
  Strategic business plan  
  Commission's findings
  Commission's positions
  Equality
  Equality Unit  
  Equality update reports  
  Economic and Social Rights
  Legal Services
  Legal instruments
  International  
  Regional  
  National  
  Access to Information / PAIA
  About PAIA  
  Deputy Information Officers' Forum  
  e-forum  
  Education and Training
  Parliamentary Unit and Treaty Monitoring
  Links
  National Links  
  International Links  
  Library
  FAQ's
  Archive
  Media archive  
  Media Releases 2006  
  Media Releases 2005  
  Media Releases 2004  
  Media Releases 2003  
  Media Releases 2002  
  Media Releases 2001  
  Media Releases 2000  
  Vacancies

  Archive : Media archive : Media Releases 2005  
 

Race-based attack on Judge Squires not warranted
Jun 6, 2005
e-mail this page e-mail  Printer friendly page Print

 

The judgment delivered by Mr Justice Squires and his two assessors last week in the Schabir Shaik trial will no doubt be the subject of discussion for a long time. There are differing responses to the judgment and while some regard it as painstakingly thorough and a correct conclusion based on the evidence before the Court, others will take issue with it for other reasons. This is the essence of living in a constitutional democracy, which has room for vibrant and robust discussion.

 

However, it must be a cause for concern when the Judge comes under attack purely on account of his race or origins and the judgment is rejected purely on account of this. Our judiciary is undergoing a process of transformation and few will argue that the current demography of our Bench adequately represents who we are as a nation – there is consensus that much work still needs to be done on that front. However, it is simply unacceptable when race is used, in the manner in which it has been in this instance, to cast doubt on the work of the Court.

 

The right of freedom of expression is constitutionally enshrined – as is the independence of the judiciary – and while the Human Rights Commission endorses the view that free expression is vital in a robust democracy, we think that those who rely on this right also have a duty to engage in such expression with some responsibility. Arguing that a judge is biased purely on account of his race or origins is unacceptable; considered arguments demonstrating how the judge’s race or origins unduly influenced his conclusions is another matter, and would be acceptable – this has not been done in this instance.  In the present case, the criticism that is directed towards Mr Justice Squires is purely on account of his race is unfortunate and certainly mars what has been a transparent and very public criminal trial.  We add our voice to the various calls that the debate in the aftermath of this trail should be conducted soberly and responsibly.

 

Jody Kollapen

Chairperson: South African Human Rights Commission

For more information contact Jody Kollapen

Tel: 011 484 8300 ext  2290/2291

 


Top of Page

 
Calendar
National Women's Day
9 August
Heritage Day
24 September
International Day for the Elderly
1 October

Media
Jul 23, 2008
Joint media statement issued by the South African Human Rights Commission and COSATU after their meeting to discuss issues related to an earlier statement by the COSATU general secretary
Jul 3, 2008
Joint Statement issued by the SAHRC and the President of the ANC Youth League, Mr Julius Malema
Jun 3, 2008
Committees set up to assist after xenophobic attacks
May 23, 2008
Africa Day: have we done enough to give reality to the vision of African Unity?
May 20, 2008
“Don’t touch my sister; don’t touch my brother!”